von Dr. habil. Heike Diefenbach
TEIL 3
hier geht es zu TEIL 1 und hier zu TEIL 2
Kompetent, unparteiisch, fair: Drei Irrtümer im Zusammenhang mit Peer Reviews
Rückschritt statt Fortschritt: Die Rückseite des Peer Review Verfahrens
Vernunft im 21. Jahrhundert
Startseite » Medienspiegel » “Peer reviewed” – kein Qualitätssiegel!
von Dr. habil. Heike Diefenbach
TEIL 3
hier geht es zu TEIL 1 und hier zu TEIL 2
Kompetent, unparteiisch, fair: Drei Irrtümer im Zusammenhang mit Peer Reviews
Rückschritt statt Fortschritt: Die Rückseite des Peer Review Verfahrens
| Cookie | Dauer | Beschreibung |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |